Mercury Retrograde in Scorpio: Unearthing Some of the Many Discrepancies in the Official 9/11 Story
Mercury retrograde October 13 to November 3, 2020 from 11 degrees Scorpio to 25 degrees Libra
Mercury conjunct Juno in Scorpio:
September 29 (3 degrees)
October 19 (Rx 9 degrees)
November 26 (22 degrees)
Mercury opposite Uranus in Taurus:
October 7 (9 degrees)
October 19 (Rx 9 degrees)
November 17 (8 degrees)
Communication, information, and intelligence planet Mercury goes retrograde on October 13 at 11 degrees Scorpio in a conjunction to soul mate asteroid Juno and an opposition to Uranus Rx in Taurus.
This indicates an unusual mix of energies involving the collection of foundational information that validates what were once considered unconventional, bizarre, or "out there" perspectives. The influence of Juno in Scorpio indicates that our soul mates have perspective or information to share that helps in this validation process, putting a more solid foundation under us. Even when it seems as if we are alone in our Plutonic/Scorpionic awareness of the corruption and, let's face it, evil coming down from on high, our soul mates are right there with us, working from behind the scenes to expose the very same things we are working to expose. They find the manipulations, the lies, and the illegitimacy just as intolerable as we do, and it's comforting to know we share this burden and this work.
These aspects and their themes remain influential for an extended period of time with a concentration point on October 19 as Mercury retrograde simultaneously forms a second exact conjunction to Juno in Scorpio and a second exact opposition to Uranus Rx in Taurus at 9 degrees of the signs.
Scorpio is a sign that involves examination, investigation, and research. It's the detective of the zodiac. Scorpio digs beneath surface realities to expose, in particular, the dark underbelly of hidden power dynamics.
Scorpio is a sign that seeks healing, release, regeneration, and empowerment, and when Mercury is in the sign, these things are coming about through information, communication, and mutual understanding, including mutual understanding of the realities that most fear, deny, suppress, or attack.
Mercury in Scorpio indicates perspectives and information that can be dangerous, even deadly. Because of this, we must be certain of the ultimate allegiances, alliances, goals, and motivations of the people we have close to us. Some of our Juno work here involves a careful sussing out of these things, as well as an extrication process if we discover crossed wires or incompatible motivations at deeper levels of engagement.
As Mercury slows to station retrograde and its energies concentrate, ruling planets Mars and Pluto are battling it out in a tense and clashing square aspect. Mars in Aries formed the initial exact square to Pluto in Capricorn in the retrograde shadow on August 13. Mars then went retrograde and backed into a second exact square to Pluto in Capricorn early this morning, October 9. Mars will go direct and move into the third and final exact square to Pluto in Capricorn on December 23.
This extended Mars in Aries-Pluto in Capricorn square indicates an ongoing theme involving direct, independent action and the exertion of personal will that break down crystallized corruption in the power structures.
The North Node of the Moon has been in Mercury-ruled Gemini since May 5, 2020. It will remain in this sign until January 18, 2022. This brings Mercurial themes of information, perspective, media, communication, transportation, and society to the forefront and makes the placement and condition of Mercury more important than usual. Successfully working with transiting Mercury as it makes its way through the zodiac is a major key to beneficial growth, development, and advancement, and Mercury in extended transit of Scorpio with dispositors Mars and Pluto squaring off is somewhat complex and challenging territory.
Mercury in Scorpio involves a theme of information-based (Mercury) control (Scorpio).
We are in an age when most people have been trained to look to "authority figures" to tell them what to think and what to do. These authority figures could be government officials, religious figures, mainstream media, the scientific establishment, the medical establishment, or something else. This creates a problematic dynamic where hierarchical institutions, many with glaring corruption issues, then have control over the information and perspective that influence billions of people on this planet.
The astrology indicates a primary requirement to keep control of our own perspectives, our own minds, and our own actions and behaviours.
Who controls the information? We do. The people do.
It's important that we vigilantly maintain control over our own information and knowledge and the sharing of those things with others.
There is no institution or organization or group or authority figure that can supersede what we know in our own guts, what we've seen or read with our own eyes, what we've heard with our own ears, and what we've experienced with our own beings.
Mercury in Scorpio involves a theme of information or perspective (Mercury) that is hidden, suppressed, denied, or attacked (Scorpio).
There is an ongoing, millennia-long battle to bring certain information, perspective, facts, and realities to the surface that will break our chains and create a more legitimate and honest foundation for life on this planet. In particular, this is a battle to expose corruption, manipulation, and criminality in hierarchical or authoritarian power structures. With Mercury in an extended transit of Scorpio, disposited by Mars in Aries in an extended square to Pluto in Capricorn, this fight is now white-hot. Live like it.
Like skilled informational warriors, we are working undercover, under the radar, behind the scenes. Alongside our Juno in Scorpio soul mates, we're bringing information and perspective to the surface, piece-by-piece, and fitting the pieces together to make a coherent picture. This is part of our healing process, both personal and collective. We cannot heal until we first expose and address the dynamics, people, and things that are harming us in the first place.
Mercury in Scorpio is extremely thorough, chasing down every hunch, traipsing through every mental back alley, poking into every dark corner. In this "Too Much Information Age" when we are intentionally being bombarded with distracting, diverting, even straight-up pointless information and opinion, this placement could make things too complex or obscure to be easily understood.
The influence of Uranus Rx in Taurus reminds us of the genius (Uranus) in keeping things simple (Taurus).
This is the genius (Uranus) in building a solid foundation (Taurus) of information (Mercury) that is based in the material world in order to support and validate our intuitive knowledge.
In light of these themes, I'm going back to basics here. This Mercury retrograde in Scorpio exercise involves laying out some of the fundamental discrepancies in the official 9/11 story. This is something that has been diligently worked on for almost 20 years now, and I thank all the people who have put forth effort to expose this situation and get justice.
I think the horrific false flag event that occurred on September 11, 2001 in New York City is a lynch pin of sorts. Clearly showing the impossibility of the official story along with the intentional cover-up of evidence could break the hold of the "Authority Figures Know Best" mentality that is currently leading humanity straight off a cliff. Seeing through the 9/11 official narrative could break some of the mesmerism people are under, forcing them to question the legitimacy of the authority figures and institutions in which they have placed so much of their trust.
Catalyzing this process is of critical importance now, of course, because we are in the grips of a global psychological operative designed to bring in authoritarian control and social engineering of almost every aspect of our lives. It is the same power scheme behind this current psychological operative that was behind the horrific false flag on September 11, 2001. I would argue that the foundation for the current control tactics and stripping of rights was put in place following the events of September 11, 2001.
The events of September 11, 2001 were used as justification to bring in new, authoritarian controls and infringements on the rights of people all over the world in the name of the "War on Terror." These authoritarian controls and rights infringements have now been extended dramatically during the orchestrated pandemic.
In the United States, the Patriot Act was signed under George W. Bush in October 2001, touted as an "anti-terrorism law." This law allowed the search of homes and businesses and the seizure of property without warrant, the spying on citizens including surveillance of emails and telephone calls, and the ability to declare a person a "terrorist" for extremely flimsy reasons, including general anti-establishment views. These authoritarian measures were continued in further Administrations, including prolonged detention under Obama, which declares the right of the government to arrest and detain a person for an indefinite amount of time without charge and without access to a lawyer.
Despite no Iraquis being involved - even in the official story - the events of 9/11 were used to justify the invasion and attack of Iraq under the guise that the country was harbouring "weapons of mass destruction." This, despite millions of U.S. citizens and people around the world marching in the streets in opposition to this invasion and attack. The people who were murdered, injured, and displaced by the war against Iraq counted in the millions, and a crisis of war orphans was created. The so-called weapons of mass destruction were never found. The use of depleted uranium munitions and bombs destroyed the health and genetic lines of Iraquis and NATO soldiers alike and continues to cause devastating birth defects and early deaths to this day.
After 9/11, there was a crackdown on international travel, similar to what we are seeing today, and this included the requirement to submit to highly irradiating body scanners or physical patdowns in order to fly on an airplane.
More than 3,000 U.S. citizens were murdered in the events that occurred on September 11, 2001. Their families have no real answers about what happened and no justice. Many of the loved ones of the people killed on that day have been diligently fighting for the truth to come out for almost 20 years now.
Unearthing Some of the Many Discrepancies in the Official 9/11 Story
It was reported that hijacked aircraft were flown into each of the World Trade Center 'Twin Towers' in New York City on September 11, 2001 and that the 110-storey towers collapsed due to resulting fires in the upper floors of the buildings. The steel-framed Twin Towers came down in a symmetrical collapse at freefall or near-freefall speed, and this would have been impossible if the official story were true. Fire would not create a controlled demolition-type collapse of a steel-framed high-rise building at freefall or near-freefall speed. This has never before occurred in history. There are 1,700 architects and engineers who have gone on the record to say the buildings could not have come down in this way as a result of damage from the aircraft and resulting fires.
This is a full documentary that provides a good primer of the evidence for controlled demolition - 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out
Most people are unaware that a third high-rise building collapsed at near-freefall speed on September 11, 2001 around seven hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers. The 47-storey World Trade Center 7 (or Building 7) was not hit by any aircraft but collapsed in the same way the twin towers collapsed. The cause of the collapse was said to be fire. Again, because of the steel-framed construction of the building and because it, like all high-rise buildings, had been designed to withstand fire and damage from an aircraft, a collapse at near-freefall speed would have been impossible due to the resistance from the lower floors. Building 7 collapsed in about seven seconds.
Many witnesses reported hearing explosions at the time the buildings were collapsing. These witnesses range from news reporters to firefighters to passersby. There is video evidence from various sources where multiple explosions can be heard. Windows blowing out from the explosions are also visible in video of Building 7 collapsing.
Trailer for a Planned Investigative Documentary titled SEVEN - this video shows the exploding windows in Building 7 prior to its collapse and media reports of the explosions. It also analyzes the audio of the explosions (possible detonations) heard just before Building 7 collapsed.
Military-grade nano-thermite residue was found in the debris following the building collapse. This type of explosive would be used in controlled demolition. The debris from the buildings was almost immediately removed and carted away to China for recycling before further investigation or testing could be conducted. This is highly irregular and also illegal.
Molten steel was seen pouring out of the towers prior to and following their collapse. A standard office fire would not have been hot enough to turn steel to a molten state, but the use of nano-thermite could have produced this effect. It has been suggested that this molten material could have been melted aluminum. However, aluminum that has been heated to a molten state will not maintain a bright red-orange colour as it moves away from the heat source. Molten steel will maintain this colour.
Danny Jowenko was a Dutch expert in controlled demolition who testified that the WTC7 collapse could only be due to controlled demolition. Jowenko died suspiciously in a single car crash on a straight road in the village of Serooskerke, the Netherlands, on July 16, 2011.
The official narrative states that the U.S. Pentagon building was also struck and damaged by a hijacked aircraft on September 11, 2001. The Pentagon is the five-storey building that houses the United States Department of Defense headquarters in Arlington County, Virginia. The damage to the Pentagon was so low on the building that the aircraft that hit it would have to be hovering horizontally only a few feet above the lawn.
CNN reporter Jamie McIntyre and other witnesses reported there was no evidence that an aircraft had hit the building - no wreckage or parts.
Captain Dan Hanley, the director of 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers, is conducting video interviews of highly experienced pilots from around the world who attest to the fact that the inexperienced alleged 9/11 Muslim hijackers could not have flown the flight paths that led to the crashes on that day. Hanley puts forth the hypothesis that the aircraft were guided to their targets through employment of the uninterruptible autopilot system (remote control). Others believe missiles hit the buildings, not aircraft. Still others believe the explosions heard that day were from bombs implanted in the buildings.
In Hanley's interviews with Captains Doug Greene, Wilhelm Felderhof, Anders Paulsson, Dave Walden, and Charlie Walker, all the highly-experienced pilots say it is impossible that relatively inexperienced hijackers flew the flight paths on September 11, 2001 that resulted in crashes of the aircraft into each of the Twin Towers and, in particular, into the five-storey Pentagon. All the interviewees say it would be impossible or near-impossible for pilots even of their own experience level, after decades flying all types of aircraft under all types of conditions, to fly the flight profiles and hit the buildings in a single attempt. Experienced pilots in flight simulators have been unable to replicate this feat.
"An example...is given by the purported profile flown by alleged Muslim hijacker Hani Hanjour who supposedly piloted American Airlines flight 77 that allegedly struck the Pentagon on 9/11. The aircraft was reported to have conducted a descending and accelerating 330 degree corkscrew turn from 7000 feet west of the Pentagon to arrive precisely at ground level to strike the Office of Naval Intelligence at nearly 500 miles per hour. This maneuver was replicated in a flight simulator. Highly experienced pilots could not perform this maneuver on successive attempts without crashing and yet, according to the official narrative, Hani Hanjour accomplished this amazing aerial feat on the first attempt with minimal aircraft experience training in light Cessna aircraft having only a few hundred hours of total flight time."
Captain Hanley is working with the hypothesis that the aircraft were being remotely controlled via the uninterruptible autopilot system. Others do not believe any aircraft hit the buildings that day at all and that the aircraft were some type of projected holograms. This type of hologram-based military psychological operative was reported on in the Washington Post in 1999 involving technology called the Holographic Projector. This might sound implausible, but the site 9/11 Planes Hoax has laid out a credible and extensive "no real planes" argument.
To summarize the findings:
There was no wreckage produced from the aircraft as they hit the sides of the buildings. There was no buckling, bending, or breaking of the aircraft visible as they made impact. News footage and amateur videos show them going cleanly through the buildings with no deceleration like a hot knife through butter. There does not appear to be any damage done to the exterior of the buildings when the aircraft are already seen to be halfway inside. There is a great deal of photographic evidence compiled at the website.
A still frame from video shot by Michael Hezarkhani on September 11, 2001
The World Trade Center towers were designed to withstand the impact from a Boeing 707, the largest airplane at the time of the towers' construction in the late 60s/early 70s, yet it appears that steel beams have been severed inside the towers by a just slightly larger Boeing 767.
In addition to the steel beams, the aircraft would have made impact with concrete floors that were four inches thick with steel plates and supporting steel trusses. This, too, would have made the "hot knife through butter" impact with the buildings impossible by an aluminum aircraft. Because of the angle of the reported impact, the aircraft would have been intersecting multiple floors of concrete and steel, which would have stopped or at least dramatically decelerated the aircraft, as well as producing wreckage.
A fourth hijacked aircraft supposedly crashed into the ground outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania on September 11. The only thing visible in the aftermath was a large, smouldering pit. The aircraft had supposedly tunneled completely into the ground with the pit closing in on it to entirely obscure anything resembling an aircraft. No jet fuel was found at or near the site.
The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board requires an investigation into all civil aircraft crashes, yet there are no crashes listed or reports on the crashes for September 11, 2001.
The site provides additional evidence from highly-experienced pilots who say the official story is impossible, including the speeds at which the aircraft were reportedly being flown. You can find more information at Pilots for 9/11 Truth.
Because we are working with highly-suppressed information and a lack of trustworthy official investigation, it is, at this time, impossible to come to a full understanding of what happened and who is responsible. With suppressed information, whether it is about the events of 9/11 or about the orchestrated pandemic currently being experienced, we are attempting to find and present enough evidence to show that the official narrative is incorrect or at the very least, that it is partial in scope. I hope the information compiled here has created some question as to the legitimacy of the official 9/11 story. I do believe this information could create the flick of a domino that topples many other dominoes, exposing and ultimately nullifying an inter-related web of authoritarian and highly-corrupt power on this planet.
Mercury leaves Scorpio for Sagittarius on December 1.