Search

Major Concerns Over the Safety and Ethics of Pfizer

Updated: Mar 3

Originally published at the main blog on December 16, 2020.



Whatever decision people make about the Covid-19 mRNA shots, there is pertinent information to be considered about the risks, and this information will not be shared in a meaningful way in mainstream media.


The Covid-19 shots are fast-tracked, experimental, synthetic messenger RNA "technology" that use lipid nano-particles to deliver mRNA directly into our cells. Messenger RNA has never before been injected en masse into the population.


Because this has been deemed an emergency situation, the usual animal safety trials have been skipped, going directly to human safety trials. The human safety trials were only 90 days long. This means that no long-term effects will be known before people are administered the shots. The mRNA shots have been developed in less than one year. Vaccines are usually developed over a ten to 15-year period before they are deemed safe. (Vaccines are never safe for everyone.)

The synthetic mRNA is injected, enters the cells, and then programs the cells to produce a spike protein that activates an immune response in the body to attack the virus. This has led to concerns about the creation of auto-immune disorders. Anaphylactic allergic reactions have already been seen in people receiving the vaccine.


The Covid-19 mRNA shots, designed to elicit an antibody response, may worsen disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in vaccinated people compared to non-vaccinated, and patients should be informed of this before they consent to receiving the shots. It's expected that elderly people will be particularly susceptible to antibody-dependent enhancement and the worsening of disease after vaccination, and they should specifically be warned about this before they decide whether to get the shots.


Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease


The messenger RNA is in addition to the other components of the vaccine, many of which can be toxic.

In the few weeks since the Covid-19 mRNA shots have been administered, there have been thousands of adverse reactions and dozens of deaths. (Update as of February 2022: shot-related injuries now count in the millions worldwide with at least tens of thousands of deaths, likely much higher.) There is no evidence the Covid shots will stop transmission or that they will stop a person from getting the virus. The declared hope is that they will lessen symptoms in the people who do become ill.

Because this type of technology is so new, it is unknown what unintended and unplanned effects it could have in the body or how harmful these effects could be. Of course, people react in different ways to things put into their bodies, whether that be food, caffeine, alcohol, pharmaceuticals, or vaccines.

In 2018, researchers discovered that changes to messenger RNA could inactivate tumour-suppressing proteins, thereby promoting cancer in the body. The research pinpointed previously unknown drivers of cancer. The unintended and unplanned effects of new technologies being used in medical applications were again illustrated in 2018 in studies produced on CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) or gene editing technology. That technology snips DNA at a particular point, and from there, the gene can be disabled or different genetic material can be inserted. CRISPR technology is also used to genetically modify seeds.

The technology was shown to have many unintended and unplanned effects after the "edits" were made. Potential DNA Damage from CRISPR 'Seriously Underestimated,' Study Finds by Sharon Begley

"From the earliest days of the CRISPR-Cas9 era, scientists have known that the first step in how it edits genomes—snipping DNA—creates an unholy mess: Cellular repairmen frantically try to fix the cuts by throwing random chunks of DNA into the breach and deleting other random bits. Research published on Monday suggests that’s only the tip of a Titanic-sized iceberg: CRISPR-Cas9 can cause significantly greater genetic havoc than experts thought, the study concludes, perhaps enough to threaten the health of patients who would one day receive CRISPR-based therapy.

The results come hard on the heels of two studies that identified a related issue: Some CRISPR’d cells might be missing a key anti-cancer mechanism and therefore be able to initiate tumors. The DNA damage found in the new study included deletions of thousands of DNA bases, including at spots far from the edit. Some of the deletions can silence genes that should be active and activate genes that should be silent, including cancer-causing genes." 2018 Study: Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements

Two studies published in 2018 showed that the altered genes could potentially trigger cancer. Futuristic gene-editing technology could cause cancer by Alexandra Klausner "Game-changing DNA-editing technology intended to rid patients of diseases may cause cancer, according to two studies. The danger with the CRISPR editing tool occurs specifically when CRISPR-Cas9 is used to replace a disease-causing gene with a healthy one.

One study by the Karolinska Institutet and another one by Novartis, both published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine, suggest that a successful CRISPR-Cas9 edit may indicate that the modified cell lacks a cancer-suppressing protein, thereby increasing a patient’s risk.

The protein, called p53, acts as the body’s cellular “first aid” kit and also causes some CRISPR edits to fail. Since CRISPR-Cas9 works like scissors to snip strands of DNA, the cut can also trigger p53 to swoop in and either repair the broken cell — or make it self-destruct...

P53 dysfunction causes significant cancer risk. It’s responsible for almost half of ovarian cancers, 43 percent of colorectal cancers and a significant number of lung, pancreatic, stomach, liver and breast cancers, according to Stat News."

The point of including this information is: these types of technologies used in medical applications are so new and relatively untested over time that it is unknown what the unintended effects on the body might be. In the case of the rushed Covid-19 vaccine, people are being turned into literal human guinea pigs.


Update: fast-moving cancers have been reported by oncologists and other doctors in patients following the mRNA shots. Dr. Sucharit Bhakti and Dr. Byram Bridle have been reporting on this phenomenon. Dr. Sucharit Bhakti: "And you all must know that there's an explosion of cancer and tumours now among the vaccinated, which no one understands, but it's the same principle. The lymphocytes in the body are responsible for keeping tumour cells under control, and these tumour cells arise every day, every hour, in your body, and if you don't control them, you are going to be the target."

Dr. Sucharit Bhakti Bitchute Video

Canadian Viral Immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle: "What I’ve seen way too much of – and it does cause me very serious concern – is we’re seeing people who had cancers that were in remission or that were being well-controlled, and their cancers have gone completely out of control after getting the vaccine. And what we do know with the vaccine is the vaccine causes at least a temporary drop in T-cell numbers and those T-cells are part of our immune system, and they’re the critical weapons that our immune system has to fight off cancerous cells. So there’s a potential mechanism there. And all I can say is I’ve seen . . . I’ve had people contact me with way too many of these reports for me to feel comfortable. I do feel that that’s probably, I would say, my newest major safety concern. And it’s also the one that is going to be by far the most underreported on any adverse event database. Because if somebody’s had a cancer before the vaccine, there’s no way public health officials will ever link it to the vaccine. But what we’re seeing is oncology teams that had pushed the cancers into remission or keeping them well-controlled can no longer control them after the vaccine."


Canadian Viral Immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle Interview: Dangers of the Covid Shots, Including Increased Cancer Rates (VIDEO and FULL TRANSCRIPT)


An informative article on the vaccine: "Before you take the Covid-19 vaccine, read this" at The Patriotic Canadian site


Major Concerns Over the the Safety and Ethics of Pfizer


The track record of the corporations making and selling the vaccine must be considered when making an informed decision, as well. There are major areas of concern as far as the safety of previous Pfizer products, as well as the ethics and trustworthiness of the corporation. Pfizer is one of the corporations producing the Covid-19 mRNA shots. Previous Pfizer Products that have Proven Harmful or Deadly: Chantix (also sold as Champix) Chantix, also sold as Champix, is touted as the "stop smoking drug." One of the known side effects of the drug is suicidal thinking and suicides. In the U.S. alone over a five year period, the United States Food and Drug Administration received reports implicating Chantix in 544 suicides and 1,869 attempted suicides. Since it is estimated that only between 1% and 10% of all adverse drug reactions are reported to official channels, the real numbers will be much higher - possibly in the tens of thousands. Other documented side effects of Chantix/Champix include seizures, blackouts, heart attacks, heart failure, severe muscle disorders and spasms, temporary blindness, blurry vision, and increased incidences of inexplicable and unprovoked violence. A Black Box warning was added to the drug after the fact to warn about psychiatric disorders. In 2013, Pfizer settled more than 2,000 lawsuits related to suicide and severe psychological disorders, setting aside $288 million to resolve these cases. Further lawsuits are ongoing, including for heart attacks and heart failure. Zoloft Zoloft is an SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) antidepressant produced and sold by Pfizer that has been linked to suicidal and homicidal behaviours. A Black Box warning was added to Zoloft indicating it may increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviours in children and young adults. In addition to suicide or suicidal thoughts, there are many other possible Zoloft side effects including cardiac arrest, liver damage, vision damage, and birth defects. Leslie Demeniuk, a Florida mother, was prescribed Zoloft and Xanax, had an immediate severe adverse reaction, could not get help when she reported it, and went on to kill her twin boys in a state of chemical psychosis. She is now serving a life sentence in prison without the possibility of parole. In an article I wrote about Leslie's story, I said that the owners and executives of Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline should be in prison instead of Leslie, and I believe this to be true. Depo-Testosterone More than 6,000 testosterone therapy lawsuits were pending in May 2018. The lawsuits say Pfizer's testosterone products caused strokes, blood clots, and heart attacks in men who used it. Pfizer is accused of aggressively marketing the drug to physicians and potential patients while downplaying the risks. Eliquis Eliquis is a Pfizer-owned blood thinning drug. At the time of its release in 2012, Eliquis was put on the market with no approved antidote available. It wasn't until 2018 that the antidote Andexaa was approved for both Eliquis and Bayer's Xarelto. In the time between the drug's release and the antidote's approval, multiple patients taking Eliquis suffered severe, uncontrollable, and in some cases, fatal bleeding events. Many of these patients and their family members have filed Eliquis bleeding lawsuits against Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer for failing to sufficiently warn patients of the drug's side effects. Lipitor Lipitor is a cholesterol-lowering drug owned by Pfizer that has been linked to the development of Type 2 diabetes after taking the drug, and this appears to affect women disproportionately. Thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer. Celebrex and Brextra Pfizer was sued by its own shareholders for covering up the safety risks of two of its drugs, eventually causing stock prices to dip. "Pfizer shareholders sued headquarters for covering up the safety risks of Celebrex and Bextra, which allegedly caused financial losses. The pain relievers were linked to an increased risk of heart attacks and strokes.

Shareholders alleged that the company knew that the drugs posed cardiovascular risks—as revealed in safety study results conducted between 1998 and 2004—but that they failed to tell the public. In 2016, Pfizer paid $468 million to settle the lawsuit." Trovan Pfizer ran an unapproved vaccine trial on 200 children with meningitis in Nigeria. Eleven children died, and others were left disabled. "Allegations against Pfizer first surfaced in December 2000, when The Washington Post broke a story about the company’s use of the experimental drug trovafloxacin (commonly called Trovan) to treat a 1996 meningitis outbreak in Nigeria’s Kano district. At issue was the company’s possible breach of global ethical guidelines on pharmaceutical trials. Pfizer, which hoped that Trovan would become a multi-billion-dollar brand, had been waiting for an opportunity to test the drug on children suffering from cerebrospinal meningitis (CSM). Since meningitis epidemics occur very infrequently in the United States, the 1996 Nigerian epidemic presented a rare opportunity for a trial. Due to the nature of the epidemic, however, Pfizer’s trial was set up hastily in conditions where parents of meningitis-infected children were panicking. Some of these parents have claimed that they did not know they were submitting their children to a trial of an experimental drug and were not told Trovan had never been tested on children." Pfizer battled the parents of the dead children for 15 years in court before being ordered to pay compensation for the deaths. Bill Gates has, of course, been one of the most vocal proponents of the Covid-19 vaccine. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has provided Pfizer multi-million dollar research grants in the past. The foundation is also said to own stock in both of the companies producing and selling the vaccine. "The foundation invested in Pfizer back in 2002 and still owns shares. It also owns shares of Pfizer's coronavirus development partner, BioNTech."

If there is risk, there must be choice. This information is provided so people can weigh the potential risks of the mRNA shots with the potential benefits to make an informed choice. Natural ways to boost immunity include eating a healthy diet with many vegetables; filtering the water you drink; adding fresh lemon juice to your water; limiting or eliminating sugar, caffeine, alcohol, and processed food; reducing stress; meditating; getting regular outdoor exercise; getting regular sunshine; getting enough sleep; laughter; being around animals; doing things you enjoy; and spending time with loved ones. You can find more information about criminality by vaccine/pharmaceuticals corporations in this article:


Faux Aquarian Corporate Do-Gooding and Mastering the Plutonic Sociological Imagination as Pluto Nears the End of its Transit of Capricorn


All Willow's Web Astrology articles on Big Pharma


RESOURCES SHOWING INJURIES AND DEATHS FOLLOWING THE COVID SHOTS


No More Silence - Covid shot injuries and deaths

Sudden Deaths After the COVID Vaccination

Sudden Death In Young People After COVID Vaccination


Deaths in the UK After COVID Vaccination - Stories


An extensive compilation of Covid shot reactions and deaths

200+ Testimonials from People Injured by the Covid Shot


1000 Covid Stories

Twitter feed compiling stories of deaths after getting the shot

VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System - United States) Covid adverse event reports

MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency - United Kingdom) Covid adverse event reports


Health Canada Covid Shot Adverse Reactions

26 views1 comment